Sculptpedia Statues, Busts and Sculptures Park sculptures and installations Ancient World & Antiquity Middle Ages & Renaissance Marble & Other Stones Bronze & Other Metals

Sarcophagus of Louis the German

The Sarcophagus of Louis the German is the name given to a sarcophagus discovered in 1800 during archaeological excavations at Lorsch Abbey. Because of where it was found and the significance of the object, it is generally linked with one of the burials in the royal crypt, although it can no longer be identified with certainty as belonging to Louis the German, his son Louis III the Younger, or his grandson Hugh. Dating from the second half of the 9th century, it is one of the most important sculptural testimonies of the Carolingian period. It is now displayed in the former Electoral House, opposite the Torhalle.

Identification

TitleSarcophagus of Louis the German
TypeSarcophagus

Historical context

PeriodCarolingian period
DateSecond half of the 9th century, probably around 876

Creator

CreatorUnknown

Discovery and provenance

Findspot and burial placeThe findspot and the burial place coincide
Burial contextLouis the German was reportedly transferred from Frankfurt am Main to Lorsch after his death on 28 August 876 and buried there the following day
Evidence for attributionNo written or unequivocal proof exists; attribution is supported by the find spot, date, workmanship, stylistic parallels, and the burial goods and remains
AttributionTraditionally and probably attributed to Louis the German, but not securely proven; alternative proposed occupants include Louis III the Younger, Hugh, and earlier Count Cancor
Original locationThe grounds of the former royal crypt of Lorsch Abbey, the Ecclesia varia
Associated findsFound with four or eight other sarcophagi or masonry coffins
Surviving statusOnly surviving piece from the group found at the site; the others were dispersed
ExcavatorBaron von Hausen, forestry superintendent / Oberforstmeister
Discovery contextFound during archaeological excavations, probably private excavations
Discovery placeLorsch Abbey, in the area of the former royal crypt
Discovery date1800

Physical characteristics

Dimensions2.05 × 0.73 × 0.67 m
Wall thickness7 cm throughout

Materials

MaterialSandstone
ConstructionCarved from a single sandstone block

Technique

Tool marksWorked with a special stone axe with a working width of exactly 4 cm

Appearance

DecorationThree inner pilasters on each long side, with matching corner pilasters at the corners
StyleIonic order, used as a motif complementary to the Roman Ionic order
WorkmanshipPillars were carved and the surfaces smoothed with a special stone axe

Iconography and meaning

InterpretationThe Ionic-order decoration is read as a symbolic reference to imperial authority and continuity with Roman tradition, and as supporting royal legitimacy in the Carolingian context
Burial contentsEyewitnesses reported the remains of a man wearing a silk robe edged with gold, with boots and spurs
Burial significanceThe burial goods suggest a person of Carolingian rank and importance greater than that of the abbots of Lorsch

Location and ownership

Museum roleOne of the central pieces in the Lorsch museum exhibition route
Current displayPermanently exhibited inside the Elector's House
Current locationFormer Elector's House (Kurfürstliches Haus), opposite the Torhalle / King's Hall, Lorsch

History and restoration

Transfer date1934
Reason for transferTransferred in connection with the restoration campaign of the Torhalle
Earlier displayDisplayed for decades at the site of the former royal crypt, but in progressively deteriorating condition and without adequate museum display
Museum adaptationThe Elector's House was adapted into a museum space to house important works from the abbey site

Significance

Art historical significanceOne of the most important sculptural testimonies of the Carolingian period
Historical significanceThe similarity to the Torhalle suggests a unitary Carolingian project intended to enhance the memory of a sovereign
Scholarly assessmentAttribution to Louis the German has been treated with increasing caution in later studies; Wilfried Hartmann judged it much more cautiously in 2002 and 2004