Sculptpedia Statues, Busts and Sculptures Park sculptures and installations Ancient World & Antiquity Middle Ages & Renaissance Marble & Other Stones Bronze & Other Metals

Stone of Motecuhzoma I

Stone of Motecuhzoma I is a pre-Columbian stone monolith dating to the rule of Motecuhzoma I, the fifth Tlatoani of Tenochtitlan, from 1440 to 1469. Also known by several other names, it is described in historical sources simply as a temalacatl, or “round stone.” The monolith measures about 12 feet in diameter and 39 inches tall. Its sides depict conquests made under Motecuhzoma I, when Tenochtitlan was strengthening its role as the capital of the Aztec Empire and receiving tribute from expanded rule. The top contains a sacrificial well, reflecting the rise in ritual human sacrifice during his reign.

Identification

TitleStone of Motecuhzoma I
Alternative namesStone of Motecuhzoma Ilhuicamina; Cuauhxicalli of Motecuhzoma Ilhuicamina; Archbishop's Stone; Ex-Arzobispado Stone; Sánchez-Nava Monolith; Piedra de Moctezuma; Stone of Montezuma I
Historical nameTemalacatl
TypeAztec stone monolith, probably a sacrificial stone (temalacatl); also identified as a temalacatl-cuauhxicalli

Historical context

DateDuring the reign of Motecuhzoma I (1440–1469); some researchers date it to the reign of Axayacatl
CultureMexica civilization; Pre-Columbian Aztec Empire

Creator

AttributionTraditionally attributed to Motecuhzoma I (Motecuhzoma Ilhuicamina); disputed by recent studies
Associated rulerMotecuhzoma I (Motecuhzoma Ilhuicamina), fifth tlatoani of Tenochtitlan

Discovery and provenance

Original locationIn front of the Temple of Tezcatlipoca, in Tenochtitlan
Discovery locationUnder the patio/courtyard of the former Archbishop's Palace (Palacio del Arzobispado) on Moneda Street, south of the Templo Mayor, Mexico City
Discovery dateJuly 1988

Location and ownership

Current locationNational Museum of Anthropology, Mexico City, in the Mexica hall

Physical characteristics

FormLarge circular/cylindrical monolith
DimensionsApproximately 224 cm in diameter and 68–76 cm tall

Materials

MaterialBasalt

Appearance

Depicted figureMotecuhzoma I dressed as Tezcatlipoca, dominating enemy captives
Border motifsSymbols alluding to human sacrifice, including crossed bones, skulls, hearts, knives, human hands, and other motifs such as copilli, tied bundles, circular rings with a cross, bone crosses, profile skulls, Cipactli, and Técpatl
Lower band57 small squares with symbols
Upper band59 small squares with symbols
Side decorationThree horizontal bands of reliefs around the cylinder
Middle bandEleven conquest scenes, each marked by a glyph
Upper face decorationConcentric-circle band, cardinal-direction arrows, and an outer band with jade and cuauhxicalli motifs
Depiction on topFace of the sun deity Tonatiuh, with a headdress, open mouth, and originally a protruding tongue in the form of a sacrificial knife
Top featureSolar disc with a circular basin in the center
OrientationIntended to be placed face-up

Iconography and meaning

Associated ceremonial objectCuauhxicalli, a receptacle for human hearts after sacrifice
Combat participantsCaptured enemy soldiers or prisoners against fully equipped Mexica warriors
FunctionProbable temalacatl used for gladiatorial combat and gladiator sacrifice
MeaningA monument to Aztec conquests and imperial expansion under Motecuhzoma I; the solar imagery is linked to sacrifice and the continuation of the sun's movement
Associated deityTezcatlipoca
Depicted deityTonatiuh, the sun deity
Depicted conquestsCulhuacan, Tenayuca, Xochimilco, Chalco, Tamazulapan, Acolhuacan, Texaxic o Tepanoaya, Tlatelolco, Tonatiuhco, Mixtlan, and Cuetlaxtlan
Depicted subject matterConquests of Motecuhzoma I; the scenes evoke his conquests over the peoples of the Valley of Mexico

History and restoration

Historical significanceAssociated with the expansion and consolidation of the Aztec Empire under Motecuhzoma I; Tenochtitlan was becoming the capital of the empire
Historical interpretationThe top basin may have collected sacrificial blood, and the stone was once painted entirely red
Historical documentationWell-documented in historical sources
Alternative dating hypothesisSome scholars propose a date in the time of Axayacatl, possibly because one scene may depict the conquest of Tlatelolco in 1473
Historical sources noteHistorical sources mention many other temalacatl that have not yet been discovered