Sculptpedia Statues, Busts and Sculptures Park sculptures and installations Ancient World & Antiquity Middle Ages & Renaissance Marble & Other Stones Bronze & Other Metals

Bronze Ram

Bronze Ram is a bronze sculpture from Syracuse, dated to the first decades of the 3rd century BC and attributed to the circle of Lysippus. It was cast using the lost-wax technique and depicts a crouching ram, apparently ready to spring forward. The work is the sole surviving piece of a pair and is kept in the “hall of bronzes” at the Salinas Archaeological Museum in Palermo. Its history is marked by a long series of movements and restorations, including transfers between Sicilian residences and later conservation work in 2005. Since 27 June 2013, it has been listed among the immovable heritage of the Sicilian Region, and it returned to the Salinas Museum in 2016.

Identification

TitleBronze Ram
Alternative nameRam of Castello Maniace
TypeAncient bronze sculpture
SubjectRam
Original titleL'Ariete in bronzo

Historical context

DatingProbably the first decades of the 3rd century BC; disputed, with dates proposed from the Hellenistic period to the Roman Imperial period
StyleGreek school

Creator

AttributionAttributed to the circle of Lysippos

Discovery and provenance

Number of figuresTwo rams originally; one survives
Associated fortressCastello Maniace, Syracuse
Placement at Castello ManiaceThe two rams flanked the main portal of the fortress at a height of seven meters
Initial location in the 13th centuryCastello Maniace, Syracuse
Documented history beginsAround the middle of the 13th century
Original functionUnknown
Original compositionPart of a pair of mirror-image ram statues
Surviving counterpartThe counterpart is lost
Place of manufactureDisputed / controversial
Another hypothesis about originThe rams may have been found during occasional excavations in Syracuse
Alternative origin traditionAccording to another tradition, the two bronze rams were brought from Constantinople to Syracuse by the Byzantine admiral George Maniakes and placed on the fortress he built there; this tradition is considered doubtful
Possible original locationThe palace of Agathocles in Syracuse
OriginFrom Syracuse

Physical characteristics

Height79 cm
Base appearanceThe base may have imitated a natural landscape such as a meadow or a rock
BaseThe irregular underside suggests the ram was mounted on an intentionally uneven base
ScaleApproximately life-size
Length138 cm
Fur on the bodyLong and wavy
DetailingRichly detailed
Fur on the headFinely curled
HornsTwisted
MouthSlightly open
Head positionHead turned to the left
PoseLying down with the left front leg raised

Materials

MaterialBronze

Technique

TechniqueHollow cast using the lost-wax casting method
Eye techniqueThe eyes were cast together with the statue

Location and ownership

Date of inclusion in Beni Inamovibili27 June 2013
Current locationMuseo Archeologico Regionale Antonino Salinas, Palermo, Italy
Included inBeni Inamovibili of the Region of Sicily
Inventory number8365

History and restoration

Other source traditionAccording to other sources, in 1820 during the unrest in Palermo they were thrown out of a window, and only one was saved
Donation to museumIn 1866, by order of King Victor Emmanuel II, the surviving restored statue was donated to the Royal Archaeological Museum of Palermo
Current museumSalinas Archaeological Museum, Palermo
Restoration campaign start2005
Restoration concernThe ram was threatened by corrosion from atmospheric humidity; the left hind leg had already detached
Return to museumOn 6 April 2016 the original ram returned to the Salinas Archaeological Museum in Palermo
Restoration byAnna Maria Carruba, under the direction of museum director Agata Villa
Restoration methodsCleaning with a microsandblaster using glass microspheres to remove atacamite; finishing with scalpels and bristle brushes mounted on a dental microdrill; stabilization of corrosion products with 5% benzotriazole applied by brush; surface coating with a thin acrylic resin film (Paraloid B72); reattachment and fixing of the detached leg using a mechanical support in steel and epoxy resin
Use of historical mold matrixA mold matrix made by the Fonderia Storica Chiurazzi of Naples in the 19th century, still unused, was employed during the restoration
Loan to CastelbuonoIn 2011 the bronze ram was loaned to the city of Castelbuono for a cycle of studies dedicated to the artifact
ExhibitionFrom 15 September to 9 December 2012 it was one of 160 works selected by the Royal Academy of Arts in London for the exhibition Bronze
Goethe's accountHe saw them in 1787 and reported it in Italian Journey
Salinas statementIn 1875 Salinas wrote that two of these rams were preserved in the Royal Palace; during the Sicilian revolution of 1848 one was smashed and melted down, and the other had projecting parts broken off, including the tail, the right knee, the right hind leg, and one ear
Later placement on tombIn 1475 Antonio, son of Giovanni Ventimiglia, placed the two relics on his tomb
Houël's legendA popular legend said the pair was part of a quartet of bronze rams on tall columns facing the four main winds; when the wind blew, the statues supposedly produced a sound like bleating, and this work was said to have been made by Archimedes
Subsequent locationVentimiglia's castle in Castelbuono
Date seen by Houël18th century
RemovalTaken away by Queen Maria, wife of Alfonso V of Aragon
Gift to Giovanni Ventimiglia1443
Reason for giftAs a reward for his loyalty after suppressing the Syracusan revolt
Gift recipientGiovanni Ventimiglia, Marquess of Geraci
ConfiscationIn 1485 the Ventimiglia, Marquesses of Geraci, rebelled against the rulers of the kingdom and were exiled, and the rams were confiscated by the viceroy Gaspare de Spes
Location after confiscationPalazzo Steri, Palermo
Later decorative locationCastello a Mare, Palermo
Transfer to Naples of viceregal residence1556
Return to PalermoThe two statues later returned to Palermo
Seen byJean-Pierre Houël, Richard Payne Knight, and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Significance

Sicilian provenance viewThe statue has often been treated as an example of Greek art from Sicily
Reception in scholarshipThe re-dating to the Middle Imperial period has partly been accepted, while the statue is still sometimes treated as an example of Sicilian Hellenistic art
Bronze art of SicilyNot sufficiently known to allow stylistic comparison
Iconographic interpretationAccording to Gans, the iconographic context may have changed and the image may have acquired a new meaning
Possible earlier originGans discussed a possible origin from Byzantium
Possible later transferIt may have been brought to Sicily only in medieval times
Reason against long-term local survivalGans considered it unlikely that such valuable statues would have remained on the island for so long because of repeated plundering of Sicily, including by the Roman governor Gaius Verres
Sicilian production disputedGans argued it need not have been produced in Sicily
Alternative dating proposedAntonine period
Contrast with Greek large bronzesIn Greek large bronzes, the eyes were usually left open in the casting and inserted later from another material
Basis for Antonine datingThe form of the eyes, especially the pupils, which Gans considered comparable to imperial-period statues
Proposed byArt historian Henning Gans
Alternative attribution sourceGisela M. A. Richter
Alternative attributionSometimes described as a Roman work based on a Hellenistic model
Art-historical period proposedHellenistic period, based on the subject and execution
Initial attributionGenerally regarded as a Greek work of art
UniquenessThe only surviving example of a pair

Iconography and meaning

Subject interpretationA crouching ram, probably ready to spring
Possible mythological interpretationPossibly a depiction of the encounter between Odysseus and the Cyclops Polyphemus, because sheep play a role in that myth
Alternative interpretationPossibly an idyllic shepherd scene
Possible settingMay have been placed in a garden or villa complex as part of a locus amoenus composition
FunctionUncertain; Heinrich Heydemann thought it was a fountain figure from whose mouth water gushed
Interpretation by GansThe ram and its counterpart may have been part of a sculptural group

Other

Original title languageGerman